Search for: "Grindr, LLC"
Results 1 - 20
of 25
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2017, 11:38 am
Grindr, LLC, 2017 WL 744605 (SDNY Feb. 24, 2017). [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 7:20 am
Grindr LLC, 2015 WL 1137870 (D.N.J. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 10:31 am
Grindr, LLC, 2023 WL 7053471 (M.D. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 12:33 pm
Grindr LLC, 18‐396 (2d Cir. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 3:32 pm
Grindr (D.N.J. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 1:51 pm
Grindr, LLC, 2015 U.S. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 7:39 am
Grindr, LLC. [read post]
3 May 2021, 8:00 am
It was under the aegis of these expanded powers that CFIUS took the step in 2019 of insisting that Beijing Kunlun Tech Co., Ltd undo an already-completed acquisition of Grindr LLC that took place in two transactions between 2016 and 2018. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 5:01 am
Grindr, LLC, decided Wednesday by Magistrate Judge Patricia Barksdale (M.D. [read post]
28 May 2019, 1:27 pm
Grindr LLC, No. 18-396 (2d Cir. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 11:21 am
Grindr, LLC, Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (CDA) continues to provide immunity to online intermediaries from liability for user content, despite pressure from courts and legislatures seeking to chip away at this safe harbor. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 9:24 am
Grindr LLC, 2018 WL 566457 (SDNY Jan. 25, 2018) ___ Section 230 Protects Message Bo [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 1:57 pm
Ltd., which was ordered by CFIUS to divest its stake in Grindr, announced that it has agreed to sell its stake in Grindr to San Vicente Acquisition LLC for roughly $608.5 million. [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 9:11 am
Case citation: 924 Bel Air Road, LLC v. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 8:42 am
Match.com, LLC, No. 17-16043 (9th Cir. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 9:06 am
Grindr, LLC, 306 F. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 11:32 am
Grindr, LLC, 93 F. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 8:08 am
Enigma Software Group USA, LLC: I write to explain why, in an appropriate case, we should consider whether the text of this increasingly important statute [47 U.S.C. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 9:02 am
LeadClick Media, LLC, the court held that Donegan did qualify as an interactive computer service provider. [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 11:52 am
The court summarizes the allegations: Plaintiffs John Doe #1 and John Doe #2 allege that when they were thirteen years old they were solicited and recruited for sex trafficking and manipulated into providing to a third-party sex trafficker pornographic videos (“the Videos”) of themselves through the social media platform Snapchat. [read post]
